Protesters Divided on Strategies to Combat the Rise of AI Technology

AI Safety Activists Call for a Pause in Development

In the heart of London, a group of protesters gathered outside the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology, united in their cause to advocate for responsible AI development. The activists, part of the global movement known as Pause AI, are calling for companies to halt the creation of large AI models due to concerns over potential risks to humanity’s future.

The Inspiration Behind the Movement

Many of the protesters were inspired by the works of philosopher Nick Bostrom, particularly his book “Superintelligence,” which explores the idea that highly advanced AI systems could potentially threaten human existence. Joseph Miller, the organizer of the London protest, cites the launch of OpenAI’s large language model Chat-GPT 3 in 2020 as a turning point in his realization that AI advancements were no longer a distant concern, but a pressing issue requiring immediate attention.

A Broad Coalition of Concerns

While many of PauseAI’s organizers have roots in the effective altruism movement, which prioritizes influencing the long-term future, they aim to build a diverse coalition that includes artists, writers, and copyright owners whose livelihoods are threatened by AI systems capable of mimicking creative works. Holly Elmore, Director of Pause AI US, emphasizes the importance of addressing the lack of consent from companies producing AI models:

“We don’t have to choose which AI harm is the most important when we’re talking about pausing as a solution. Pause is the only solution that addresses all of them.”

The Power of Protest Movements

Gideon Futerman, a dedicated protester, believes that popular movements can significantly influence the trajectory of new technologies. He cites the impact of pushback against genetically modified organisms in Europe during the 1990s and the resistance to nuclear power as examples of how public opinion can shape the adoption of technologies, even those promising benefits such as low-carbon power or increased crop yields.

A Moderate Approach to Activism

Despite their concerns, the leaders of Pause AI emphasize their commitment to moderate tactics and methods. They aim to be a trustworthy and legal movement, eschewing disruptive direct actions such as sit-ins or encampments near AI offices. Elmore states:

“I want to be the moderate base for a lot of organizations in this space. I’m sure we would never condone violence. I also want Pause AI to go further than that and just be very trustworthy.”

Optimism for the Future

As the protesters continue their efforts to raise awareness about the potential risks of AI, they remain hopeful that their message will be heard. Meindertsma, the founder of Pause AI, rejects the “AI doomer” label, emphasizing his belief in humanity’s ability to address these challenges:

“A doomer is someone who gives up on humanity. I’m an optimistic person; I believe we can do something about this.”

With their commitment to responsible AI development and their faith in the power of public engagement, the activists of Pause AI continue their mission to ensure a safer future for all.